Closed System Transfer Devices Market by Closing Mechanism (Luer-Lock, Push-to-Turn), Type (Membrane-to-Membrane, Needleless), Technology (Diaphragm, Compartmentalize, Air Filtration), Component, End User (Hospital, Clinic) - Global Forecast to 2024

密封式薬剤移送システムの世界市場予測(~2024年)

◆タイトル:Closed System Transfer Devices Market by Closing Mechanism (Luer-Lock, Push-to-Turn), Type (Membrane-to-Membrane, Needleless), Technology (Diaphragm, Compartmentalize, Air Filtration), Component, End User (Hospital, Clinic) - Global Forecast to 2024
◆商品コード:MD 6925
◆調査・発行会社:MarketsandMarkets
◆発行日:2019年2月26日
◆ページ数:191
◆レポート形式:PDF / 英語
◆納品方法:Eメール(受注後24時間以内)
◆調査対象地域:グローバル
◆産業分野:医療機器
◆販売価格オプション(消費税別)
Single User(1名様閲覧)USD5,650 ⇒換算¥587,600見積依頼/購入/質問フォーム
Multi User (Five User)USD6,650 ⇒換算¥691,600見積依頼/購入/質問フォーム
Corporate License (全社内共有可)USD8,150 ⇒換算¥847,600見積依頼/購入/質問フォーム
販売価格オプションの説明はこちらでご利用ガイドはこちらでご確認いただけます。
※お支払金額は「換算金額(日本円)+消費税+配送料(Eメール納品は無料)」です。
※Eメールによる納品の場合、通常ご注文当日~2日以内に納品致します。
※商品の納品後、納品日+5日以内に請求書を発行し、お客様宛に郵送いたしますので、請求書発行日より2ヶ月以内に銀行振込にて支払をお願いします。(振込先:三菱東京UFJ銀行/京橋支店/H&Iグローバルリサーチ株式会社)
※上記の日本語題名はH&Iグローバルリサーチが翻訳したものです。英語版原本には日本語表記はありません。
※為替レートは適宜修正・更新しております。リアルタイム更新ではありません。
※ご購入後、レポートに記載の英語表現や単語の意味に関しましては無料でお答えいたします。(但し、対応範囲は弊社で判断)
※弊社H&Iグローバルリサーチ株式会社はMarketsandMarketsの日本における正規販売代理店です。

【レポートの概要】

密封式薬剤移送システムの世界市場は、2019年の3億9,000万米ドルから2024年には9億8,200万米ドルに達し、この期間中20.3%の年平均成長率で成長すると予測されています。この市場の成長を促す要因として、がんの発生率の増加、腫瘍治療薬の承認数の増加、細胞障害性薬物または抗悪性腫瘍薬の悪影響を取り除くことを目的とした密封式薬剤移送システムの使用増加、危険な薬物の安全な取り扱いと使用に関する規制ガイドラインの改善などが考えられます。一方で、CSTD導入コストが高価であること、医療保険払い戻しの環境が整っていないこと、ならびに発展途上国において規制ガイドラインが遵守されていないことにより、市場の成長が抑制されています。当調査レポートでは、密封式薬剤移送システムの世界市場について調査・分析し、エグゼクティブサマリー、市場インサイト、市場概観/市場動向、市場シェア分析、閉鎖機構(ルアーロック、プッシュトゥターン)分析、種類(メンブレン間、ニードルレス)分析、技術(ダイアフラム、区画化、空気ろ過)分析、コンポーネント分析、密封式薬剤移送システムの世界市場規模及び予測、市場動向、競争状況、関連企業分析などの情報をお届けいたします。

“The global closed system transfer devices Market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 20.3%.”The closed system transfer devices market is projected to reach USD 982 million by 2024 from USD 390 million in 2019, at a CAGR of 20.3%. Factors such as the rising incidence of cancer, an increasing number of oncology drug approvals, increasing use of closed system transfer devices to combat the harmful effects of cytotoxic or antineoplastic drugs, and improving regulatory guidelines regarding the safe handling and use of hazardous drugs are driving the growth of the closed system transfer devices market. However, market growth is mainly restricted by the high cost of implementation of CSTDs and lack of reimbursement as well as lack of compliance with regulatory guidelines in developing countries.

“Compartmentalized devices to witness the highest growth during the forecast period.”
On the basis of technology, the closed system transfer devices market is segmented into diaphragm-based devices, compartmentalized devices, and air cleaning/filtration devices. The compartmentalized devices segment is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Compartmentalized devices are priced at a lower cost as compared to diaphragm-based devices. Also, these systems are truly closed in nature, providing maximum safety to healthcare workers and patients. These factors are driving the adoption of compartmentalized devices in the CSTDs market.

“Membrane-to-membrane systems to witness the highest growth during the forecast period.”
By type, the closed system transfer devices market is segmented into membrane-to-membrane systems and needleless systems. In 2018, the membrane-to-membrane systems segment accounted for the largest share of the closed system transfer devices market. The large share and high growth of this segment can be attributed to their ease of operation and the lower risk of contamination associated with double-membrane containment systems.

“Hospitals to register the highest CAGR during the forecast period.”
On the basis of end users, the market is segmented into hospitals, oncology centers & clinics, and other end users. Hospitals are expected to show significant growth opportunities during the forecast period. The high growth of this segment is mainly due to the strong financial capabilities of hospitals for purchasing high-priced CSTDs as compared to oncology centers and clinics, large cancer patient pool, and the increasing need to comply with the regulatory guidelines established by the FDA and NIOSH regarding the safety of healthcare providers.

“Asia Pacific is projected to witness the highest growth during the forecast period.”
Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The rising incidence of cancer, increasing demand for better healthcare services in developing economies, and increasing focus of international players on emerging markets such as India and China are driving the growth of the closed system transfer devices market in the Asia Pacific.

A breakdown of the primary participants referred to for this report is provided below:
• By Company Type: Tier 1 (45%), Tier 2 (30%), and Tier 3 (25%)
• By Designation: C-level (45%), Director Level (35%), and Others (20%)
• By Region: North America (55%), Europe (18%), Asia Pacific (12%), Latin America (10%), and the Middle East & Africa (5%)

Prominent players in the closed system transfer devices market are Becton, Dickinson and Company (US), ICU Medical, Inc. (US), Equashield LLC. (US), B. Braun Melsungen AG (Germany), Corvida Medical (US), Yukon Medical (US), JMS Co., Ltd. (US), CODAN Medizinische Geräte GmbH & Co KG (Germany), Baxter International, Inc. (US), VICTUS (US), and Caragen Ltd. (Ireland).
Research Coverage:
The report analyzes the market for various closed system transfer devices and their adoption patterns. It aims at estimating the market size and future growth potential of the global closed system transfer devices market and different segments such as type, closing mechanism, component, technology, end user, and region. The report also includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the key players in this market along with their company profiles, product offerings, and recent developments.
Reasons to Buy the Report
The report will enrich established firms as well as new entrants/smaller firms to gauge the pulse of the market, which, in turn, would help them garner a greater share. Firms purchasing the report could use one or any combination of the below-mentioned five strategies for strengthening their market presence.

This report provides insights on the following pointers:
• Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on the product portfolios offered by the top players in the global closed system transfer devices market
• Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on the upcoming trends, R&D activities, and product launches and approvals in the global closed system transfer devices market
• Market Development: Comprehensive information on the lucrative emerging regions by type, closing mechanism, component, technology, end user, and region
• Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, growing geographies, and recent developments in the global closed system transfer devices market
• Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, revenue analysis, and products of leading players in the global closed system transfer devices market

【レポートの目次】

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION 20
1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 20
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION 20
1.3 MARKET SCOPE 20
1.3.1 MARKETS COVERED 21
1.3.2 YEARS CONSIDERED FOR THE STUDY 21
1.4 CURRENCY 22
1.5 LIMITATIONS 22
1.6 STAKEHOLDERS 22
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 23
2.1 RESEARCH DATA 23
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA 24
2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources 25
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA 25
2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources 27
2.1.2.2 Key industry insights 28
2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION 30
2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH 31
2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH 31
2.3 MARKET BREAKDOWN AND DATA TRIANGULATION 32
2.4 ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE STUDY 33
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 34
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS 40
4.1 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET OVERVIEW 40
4.2 ASIA PACIFIC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY 41
4.3 GEOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT OF THE CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET (2018) 42
4.4 GEOGRAPHIC MIX: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
2019–2024 (USD MILLION) 43
4.5 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: DEVELOPING VS. DEVELOPED MARKETS, 2019 VS. 2024 (USD MILLION) 43

5 MARKET OVERVIEW 44
5.1 INTRODUCTION 44
5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS: IMPACT ANALYSIS 44
5.2.1 DRIVERS 45
5.2.1.1 Rising incidence of cancer 45
5.2.1.2 Increasing number of oncology drug approvals 47
5.2.1.3 Increasing use of closed system transfer devices to combat the harmful effects of cytotoxic or antineoplastic drugs 47
5.2.1.4 Improving regulatory guidelines regarding the safe handling and use of hazardous drugs 48
5.2.2 RESTRAINTS 49
5.2.2.1 High cost of implementation of CSTDs and lack of reimbursement 49
5.2.2.2 Lack of compliance with regulatory guidelines in developing countries 50
5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES 51
5.2.3.1 Use of CSTDs in other therapeutic areas 51
5.2.3.2 Rapid growth in emerging markets 51
5.2.4 CHALLENGES 52
5.2.4.1 Gaps with existing CSTDs 52
5.2.4.2 Low awareness among nurses about CSTDs 53
6 INDUSTRY INSIGHTS 54
6.1 INTRODUCTION 54
6.2 INDUSTRY TRENDS 55
6.2.1 AUTOMATION IN CSTD 55
6.3 PRODUCT FEATURES AND PRICING ANALYSIS 55
6.4 UTILIZATION/ADOPTION OF CSTD, BY REGION 57
6.5 REGULATORY GUIDELINES 57
6.5.1 USP <800> REGULATIONS 58
6.5.2 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (NIOSH) 58
6.5.3 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS (ASHP) 60
6.5.4 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTITIONERS (ISOPP) 60
6.6 REGULATORY ANALYSIS 61
7 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM 62
7.1 INTRODUCTION 63
7.2 PUSH-TO-TURN SYSTEMS 64
7.2.1 HIGH ADOPTION OF PHASEAL, A PIONEER IN THE CSTD MARKET
—A KEY MARKET DRIVER 64
7.3 COLOR-TO-COLOR ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS 65
7.3.1 LOW SYSTEM COST, ALONG WITH THE ADVANTAGES OFFERED, INCREASES THE ADOPTION OF THESE SYSTEMS AMONG PHARMACISTS, ONCOLOGISTS, AND NURSES 65
7.4 LUER-LOCK SYSTEMS 66
7.4.1 LUER-LOCK MECHANISMS REDUCE THE RISK OF EXPOSURE, REQUIRE FEWER COMPONENTS, AND GENERATE LESS BIOHAZARDOUS WASTE
—KEY ADVANTAGES DRIVING GROWTH 66
7.5 CLICK-TO-LOCK SYSTEMS 67
7.5.1 THE USER-FRIENDLY NATURE OF CLICK-TO-LOCK MECHANISMS DRIVES THEIR ADOPTION AMONG END USERS 67
8 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE 69
8.1 INTRODUCTION 70
8.2 MEMBRANE-TO-MEMBRANE SYSTEMS 70
8.2.1 MEMBRANE-TO-MEMBRANE SYSTEMS PROVIDE A DOUBLE LAYER OF PROTECTION FOR THE SAFE TRANSFER OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS 70
8.3 NEEDLELESS SYSTEMS 71
8.3.1 CHEMOLOCK IS THE FIRST FDA APPROVED NEEDLELESS CSTD SYSTEM 71
9 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT 73
9.1 INTRODUCTION 74
9.2 VIAL ACCESS DEVICES 74
9.2.1 INCREASING REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TO DRIVE THE ADOPTION OF VIAL ACCESS DEVICES IN HOSPITALS & ONCOLOGY CENTERS 74
9.3 SYRINGE SAFETY DEVICES 76
9.3.1 ADVANTAGES SUCH AS EASE OF USE AND LEAK PREVENTION ARE DRIVING THE ADOPTION OF THESE DEVICES GLOBALLY 76
9.4 BAG/LINE ACCESS DEVICES 78
9.4.1 COMPATIBILITY OF BAG/LINE ACCESS DEVICES WITH BOTH TYPES OF CSTDS DRIVES MARKET GROWTH 78
9.5 ACCESSORIES 79
9.5.1 MAJOR CSTDS SUCH AS PHASEAL, ONGUARD, AND CHEMOCLAVE REQUIRE DEDICATED ADMINISTRATION SETS, WHICH DRIVES GROWTH IN THE ACCESSORIES MARKET 79
10 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY 82
10.1 INTRODUCTION 83
10.2 DIAPHRAGM-BASED DEVICES 83
10.2.1 DIAPHRAGM-BASED DEVICES DOMINATE THE CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET DUE TO THE EASE OF USE & SAFETY PROVIDED DURING THE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS 83
10.3 COMPARTMENTALIZED DEVICES 85
10.3.1 COMPARTMENTALIZED DEVICES TO WITNESS THE HIGHEST GROWTH IN THE CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET DURING THE FORECAST PERIOD 85
10.4 AIR CLEANING/FILTRATION DEVICES 86
10.4.1 AIR CLEANING DEVICES INCORPORATE AN ACTIVATED CARBON OR HYDROPHOBIC FILTER TO HELP REDUCE THE OUTFLOW OF CONTAMINANTS 86

11 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER 88
11.1 INTRODUCTION 89
11.2 HOSPITALS 90
11.2.1 HOSPITALS FORM THE LARGEST END-USER SEGMENT OF THE CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET 90
11.3 ONCOLOGY CENTERS & CLINICS 91
11.3.1 INCREASING REGULATORY MANDATES TO DRIVE THE ADOPTION OF CSTDS IN ONCOLOGY CENTERS & CLINICS 91
11.4 OTHER END USERS 92
12 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY REGION 94
12.1 INTRODUCTION 95
12.2 NORTH AMERICA 96
12.2.1 US 100
12.2.1.1 US dominates the North American market primarily due to the presence of leading CSTD manufacturing companies & high burden of cancer 100
12.2.2 CANADA 103
12.2.2.1 Increasing prevalence of cancer to drive the growth of the Canadian closed system transfer devices market 103
12.3 EUROPE 106
12.3.1 GERMANY 110
12.3.1.1 Germany to witness the highest growth in the European closed system transfer devices market 110
12.3.2 UK 113
12.3.2.1 High cost of CSTDs to restrain market growth 113
12.3.3 FRANCE 116
12.3.3.1 High cancer prevalence and the high healthcare expenditure in the country to drive market growth in France 116
12.3.4 SPAIN 119
12.3.4.1 Lack of specific regulations about CSTDs is restraining the growth of this market 119
12.3.5 ITALY 122
12.3.5.1 Increasing geriatric population and the subsequent increase in the prevalence of cancer to drive the market for closed system transfer devices in Italy 122
12.3.6 REST OF EUROPE 125
12.4 ASIA PACIFIC 128
12.4.1 JAPAN 132
12.4.1.1 Japan to dominate the APAC closed system transfer devices market 132
12.4.2 CHINA 135
12.4.2.1 Untapped China market with large patient pool provides significant growth opportunities for closed system transfer devices market 135

12.4.3 INDIA 138
12.4.3.1 Low manufacturing cost and skilled workforce are attracting outsourcing and investment to India 138
12.4.4 REST OF APAC 141
12.5 LATIN AMERICA 143
12.5.1 RISING CANCER INCIDENCE TO DRIVE MARKET GROWTH IN LATAM 143
12.6 MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA 146
12.6.1 MEA MARKET TO GROW AT A SLOWER RATE THAN LATIN AMERICA 146
13 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE 149
13.1 OVERVIEW 149
13.2 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 150
13.3 COMPETITIVE LEADERSHIP MAPPING, 2018 151
13.4 VENDOR INCLUSION CRITERIA 152
13.5 VENDOR DIVE 152
13.5.1 VISIONARY LEADERS 152
13.5.2 INNOVATORS 152
13.5.3 EMERGING COMPANIES 152
13.5.4 DYNAMIC DIFFERENTIATORS 153
13.6 COMPETITIVE SITUATIONS AND TRENDS 154
13.6.1 PARTNERSHIPS AND AGREEMENTS 155
13.6.2 PRODUCT LAUNCHES AND APPROVALS 155
13.6.3 ACQUISITIONS 155
14 COMPANY PROFILES 157
(Introduction, Products & Services, Strategy, & Analyst Insights, Developments, MnM View)*
14.1 BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY (BD) 157
14.2 ICU MEDICAL, INC. 160
14.3 B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN 163
14.4 JMS CO., LTD. 166
14.5 EQUASHIELD LLC. 168
14.6 TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. 171
14.7 CORVIDA MEDICAL 173
14.8 YUKON MEDICAL 174
14.9 CODAN MEDIZINISCHE GERÄTE GMBH & CO KG 175
14.10 VICTUS, INC. 176
14.11 CARAGEN LTD. 177
14.12 BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC. 178

*Details on MarketsandMarkets view, Introduction, Product & Services, Strategy, & Analyst Insights, New Developments might not be captured in case of unlisted companies.
15 APPENDIX 180
15.1 INSIGHTS OF INDUSTRY EXPERTS 180
15.2 DISCUSSION GUIDE 181
15.3 KNOWLEDGE STORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL 186
15.4 AVAILABLE CUSTOMIZATIONS 188
15.5 RELATED REPORTS 189
15.6 AUTHOR DETAILS 190

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1 STANDARD CURRENCY CONVERSION RATES 22
TABLE 2 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET SNAPSHOT, 2019 VS. 2024 35
TABLE 3 CANCER RATES, BY COUNTRY (2018) 45
TABLE 4 NEW CANCER CASES IN THE US (2015–2018) 46
TABLE 5 LIST OF NATIONAL/LOCAL REGULATORY BODIES RECOMMENDING THE USE OF CSTDS FOR THE SAFE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS, BY COUNTRY 49
TABLE 6 AVERAGE ANNUAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF VARIOUS CSTD SYSTEMS (USD) 50
TABLE 7 ISSUES, CHALLENGES, AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS REGARDING THE SAFE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS 52
TABLE 8 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE CSTDS BASED ON PRODUCT FEATURES 56
TABLE 9 INTENSITY OF UTILIZATION/ADOPTION OF VARIOUS TYPES OF CSTDS, BY REGION 57
TABLE 10 STRINGENCY OF REGULATIONS FOR ADOPTION OF CSTD, BY REGION 57
TABLE 11 NIOSH CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS 58
TABLE 12 NIOSH HAZARDOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 59
TABLE 13 NIOSH AND ASHP DEFINITIONS OF HAZARDOUS DRUGS 60
TABLE 14 TYPES OF CLOSING MECHANISMS IN THE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE CSTDS 63
TABLE 15 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 63
TABLE 16 PUSH-TO-TURN CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 64
TABLE 17 COLOR-TO-COLOR ALIGNMENT CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 65
TABLE 18 LUER-LOCK CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COUNTRY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 67
TABLE 19 CLICK-TO-LOCK CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 68
TABLE 20 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 70
TABLE 21 LEADING MANUFACTURERS OF MEMBRANE-TO-MEMBRANE SYSTEMS 70
TABLE 22 MEMBRANE-TO-MEMBRANE SYSTEMS MARKET, BY COUNTRY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 71
TABLE 23 LEADING MANUFACTURERS OF NEEDLELESS SYSTEMS 72
TABLE 24 NEEDLELESS SYSTEMS MARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 72
TABLE 25 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 74
TABLE 26 VIAL ACCESS COMPONENTS FOR CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES 75
TABLE 27 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR VIAL ACCESS DEVICES,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 76
TABLE 28 SYRINGE SAFETY COMPONENTS FOR CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES 77
TABLE 29 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR SYRINGE SAFETY DEVICES,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 77
TABLE 30 BAG/LINE ACCESS COMPONENTS FOR CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES 78
TABLE 31 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR BAG/LINE ACCESS DEVICES, BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 79
TABLE 32 ACCESSORIES FOR CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES 80
TABLE 33 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR ACCESSORIES,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 81
TABLE 34 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 83
TABLE 35 DIAPHRAGM-BASED CSTDS AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET 84
TABLE 36 DIAPHRAGM-BASED CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 84
TABLE 37 COMPARTMENTALIZED CSTDS AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET 85
TABLE 38 COMPARTMENTALIZED CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 86
TABLE 39 AIR CLEANING/FILTRATION CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 87
TABLE 40 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 89
TABLE 41 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR HOSPITALS,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 91
TABLE 42 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR ONCOLOGY CENTERS & CLINICS, BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 92
TABLE 43 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET FOR OTHER END USERS,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 93
TABLE 44 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY REGION,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 96
TABLE 45 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COUNTRY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 98
TABLE 46 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 98
TABLE 47 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY TYPE, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 98
TABLE 48 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY TECHNOLOGY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 99
TABLE 49 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COMPONENT, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 99
TABLE 50 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY END USER, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 100
TABLE 51 US: KEY MACROINDICATORS 101
TABLE 52 US: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 101
TABLE 53 US: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 102
TABLE 54 US: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 102
TABLE 55 US: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 102
TABLE 56 US: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 103
TABLE 57 CANADA: KEY MACROINDICATORS 104
TABLE 58 CANADA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 104
TABLE 59 CANADA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 104
TABLE 60 CANADA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 105
TABLE 61 CANADA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 105
TABLE 62 CANADA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 106
TABLE 63 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COUNTRY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 108
TABLE 64 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 108
TABLE 65 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 109
TABLE 66 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 109
TABLE 67 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 109
TABLE 68 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 110
TABLE 69 GERMANY: KEY MACROINDICATORS 111
TABLE 70 GERMANY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 111
TABLE 71 GERMANY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 111
TABLE 72 GERMANY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 112
TABLE 73 GERMANY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 112
TABLE 74 GERMANY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 113
TABLE 75 UK: KEY MACROINDICATORS 114
TABLE 76 UK: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 114
TABLE 77 UK: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 114
TABLE 78 UK: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 115
TABLE 79 UK: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 115
TABLE 80 UK: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 116
TABLE 81 FRANCE: KEY MACROINDICATORS 117
TABLE 82 FRANCE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 117
TABLE 83 FRANCE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 117
TABLE 84 FRANCE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 118
TABLE 85 FRANCE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 118
TABLE 86 FRANCE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 119
TABLE 87 SPAIN: KEY MACROINDICATORS 120
TABLE 88 SPAIN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 120
TABLE 89 SPAIN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 120
TABLE 90 SPAIN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 121
TABLE 91 SPAIN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 121
TABLE 92 SPAIN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 122
TABLE 93 ITALY: KEY MACROINDICATORS 123
TABLE 94 ITALY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 123
TABLE 95 ITALY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 123
TABLE 96 ITALY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 124
TABLE 97 ITALY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 124
TABLE 98 ITALY: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 125
TABLE 99 ROE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 126
TABLE 100 ROE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 126
TABLE 101 ROE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 127
TABLE 102 ROE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 127
TABLE 103 ROE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 128
TABLE 104 APAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COUNTRY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 130
TABLE 105 APAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 130
TABLE 106 APAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 131
TABLE 107 APAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 131
TABLE 108 APAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 131
TABLE 109 APAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 132
TABLE 110 JAPAN: KEY MACROINDICATORS 133
TABLE 111 JAPAN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 133
TABLE 112 JAPAN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 134
TABLE 113 JAPAN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 134
TABLE 114 JAPAN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 134
TABLE 115 JAPAN: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 135
TABLE 116 CHINA: KEY MACROINDICATORS 136
TABLE 117 CHINA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 136
TABLE 118 CHINA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 136
TABLE 119 CHINA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 137
TABLE 120 CHINA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 137
TABLE 121 CHINA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 138
TABLE 122 INDIA: KEY MACROINDICATORS 138
TABLE 123 INDIA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 139
TABLE 124 INDIA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 139
TABLE 125 INDIA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 139
TABLE 126 INDIA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 140
TABLE 127 INDIA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 140
TABLE 128 ROAPAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 141
TABLE 129 ROAPAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 142
TABLE 130 ROAPAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 142
TABLE 131 ROAPAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 142
TABLE 132 ROAPAC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 143
TABLE 133 LATIN AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 143
TABLE 134 LATIN AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY TYPE, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 144
TABLE 135 LATIN AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY TECHNOLOGY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 144
TABLE 136 LATIN AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COMPONENT, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 145
TABLE 137 LATIN AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY END USER, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 145
TABLE 138 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY CLOSING MECHANISM, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 146
TABLE 139 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY TYPE, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 146
TABLE 140 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY TECHNOLOGY, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 147
TABLE 141 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY COMPONENT, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 147
TABLE 142 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET,
BY END USER, 2017–2024 (USD MILLION) 148
TABLE 143 GROWTH STRATEGY MATRIX (2015–2018) 150
TABLE 144 EXPANSIONS, 2015-2018 154
TABLE 145 PARTNERSHIPS AND AGREEMENTS, 2015–2018 155
TABLE 146 PRODUCT LAUNCHES AND APPROVALS, 2015–2018 155
TABLE 147 ACQUISITIONS, 2015–2018 156


LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1 RESEARCH DESIGN 23
FIGURE 2 PRIMARY SOURCES 26
FIGURE 3 BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY INTERVIEWS (SUPPLY-SIDE): BY COMPANY TYPE, DESIGNATION, AND REGION 29
FIGURE 4 BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY INTERVIEWS (DEMAND-SIDE): BY END USER, DESIGNATION, AND REGION 29
FIGURE 5 DATA TRIANGULATION METHODOLOGY 32
FIGURE 6 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY CLOSING MECHANISM,
2019 VS. 2024 (USD MILLION) 36
FIGURE 7 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TYPE,
2019 VS. 2024 (USD MILLION) 36
FIGURE 8 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY,
2019 VS. 2024 (USD MILLION) 37
FIGURE 9 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY COMPONENT,
2019 VS. 2024 (USD MILLION) 38
FIGURE 10 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET, BY END USER,
2019 VS. 2024 (USD MILLION) 38
FIGURE 11 GEOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET 39
FIGURE 12 RISING INCIDENCE OF CANCER IS DRIVING THE GROWTH OF THE CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET 40
FIGURE 13 DIAPHRAGM-BASED DEVICES ACCOUNTED FOR THE LARGEST SHARE
OF THE APAC CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET IN 2018 41
FIGURE 14 US ACCOUNTED FOR THE LARGEST SHARE OF THE MARKET IN 2018 42
FIGURE 15 APAC TO GROW AT THE HIGHEST CAGR DURING THE FORECAST PERIOD 43
FIGURE 16 DEVELOPING MARKETS TO REGISTER HIGHER GROWTH DURING THE FORECAST PERIOD 43
FIGURE 17 GLOBAL CANCER INCIDENCE (2008–2030) 45
FIGURE 18 SHARE OF GERIATRIC INDIVIDUALS AMONG NEW CANCER CASES (2012–2030) 46
FIGURE 19 EVOLUTIONARY TIMELINE OF KEY CSTD DEVELOPMENTS 54
FIGURE 20 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET: GEOGRAPHIC GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES 95
FIGURE 21 NORTH AMERICA: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET SNAPSHOT 97
FIGURE 22 EUROPE: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET SNAPSHOT 107
FIGURE 23 ASIA PACIFIC: CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET SNAPSHOT 129
FIGURE 24 KEY DEVELOPMENTS OF MAJOR PLAYERS BETWEEN
JANUARY 2015 AND NOVEMBER 2018 149
FIGURE 25 CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS,
BY KEY PLAYER, 2018 150
FIGURE 26 COMPETITIVE LEADERSHIP MAPPING, CLOSED SYSTEM TRANSFER DEVICES MARKET (2018) 153
FIGURE 27 EXPANSIONS WAS THE KEY GROWTH STRATEGY ADOPTED BY MAJOR PLAYERS BETWEEN 2015 & 2018 154
FIGURE 28 BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY: COMPANY SNAPSHOT 157

FIGURE 29 ICU MEDICAL: COMPANY SNAPSHOT 160
FIGURE 30 B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN: COMPANY SNAPSHOT 163
FIGURE 31 JMS CO., LTD.: COMPANY SNAPSHOT 166
FIGURE 32 TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS: COMPANY SNAPSHOT 171
FIGURE 33 BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.: COMPANY SNAPSHOT 178


★調査レポート[密封式薬剤移送システムの世界市場予測(~2024年)] ( Closed System Transfer Devices Market by Closing Mechanism (Luer-Lock, Push-to-Turn), Type (Membrane-to-Membrane, Needleless), Technology (Diaphragm, Compartmentalize, Air Filtration), Component, End User (Hospital, Clinic) - Global Forecast to 2024 / MD 6925) 販売に関する免責事項
[密封式薬剤移送システムの世界市場予測(~2024年)] ( Closed System Transfer Devices Market by Closing Mechanism (Luer-Lock, Push-to-Turn), Type (Membrane-to-Membrane, Needleless), Technology (Diaphragm, Compartmentalize, Air Filtration), Component, End User (Hospital, Clinic) - Global Forecast to 2024 / MD 6925) についてEメールでお問い合わせ


◆H&Iグローバルリサーチ株式会社のお客様(例)◆