1. Analyst View
2. Research Methodology
3. A Brief Overview
3.1 Types of Devices
3.1.1 Handheld Instruments
3.1.2 Guiding Systems
3.1.3 Inflation Systems
3.1.4 Imaging Devices (IGS)
3.1.5 Electrosurgical Devices
4. Drivers
4.1 Value-Based Medicine to Boost Demand for Minimally Invasive Surgeries
4.2 Inclining Healthcare Expenditure is Boon for MIMD Market
4.3 Minimally Invasive Tools Proving as Game Changer for Doctors and Patients
4.4 Technological Innovations in Imaging Systems Propelling Growth
5. Challenges
5.1 High Operating Cost – Biggest Concern for MIS Industry
5.2 Reimbursement Issues Hampering Minimally Invasive Surgery Market Growth
5.3 Ambiguous Regulatory Framework Holding Back New Product Approvals
6. Market Overview
6.1 Minimally Invasive Device Market
6.2 Market Segmentation by Types of Devices
6.2.1 Minimally Invasive Surgical Devices
6.2.2 Minimally Invasive Endoscopy Devices
6.2.3 Minimally Invasive Visualization & Monitoring Devices
6.3 Market Segmentation by Geography
7. Regulatory Landscape
7.1 US
7.2 Europe
7.3 Asia-Pacific
7.3.1 India
7.3.2 China
8. Market Trends and Developments
8.1 Hospitals Offering Benefits to Patients by Adopting High -Tech Surgeries
8.2 Firms Flooding the Market with Innovative Products
8.3 MIS Providing Significant Benefits to Spinal Problems
9. Mergers & Acquisitions
10. Competitive Landscape
10.1 Share of Major Players in the MIMD Market
10.2 Profiles
10.2.1 Intuitive Surgical
10.2.2 Medtronic Inc
10.2.3 Stryker Corporation
10.2.4 Boston Scientific
10.2.5 GE Healthcare
10.2.6 Covidien
10.2.7 Siemens Healthcare
10.2.8 Philip Healthcare
10.2.9 Johnson & Johnson
11. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

List of Figures:

Figure 6-1: Global – Minimally Invasive Device Market (Billion US$), 2014-2020
Figure 6-2: Global – Minimally Invasive Device Market by Types of Devices (%), 2014
Figure 6-3: Global – Minimally Invasive Device Market by Types of Devices (%), 2020
Figure 6-4: Global – Minimally Invasive Surgical Device Market (Billion US$), 2014-2020
Figure 6 5: Global – Minimally Invasive Endoscopy Device Market (Billion US$), 2014-2020
Figure 6-6: Global – Minimally Invasive Visualization & Monitoring Devices (Billion US$), 2014
Figure 6-7: Global – Minimally Invasive Devices Market by Geography (%), 2014
Figure 10-1: Share of Major Players in Global MIMD Industry (%), 2014
Figure 10-2: Intuitive Surgical – Breakup of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-3: Medtronic Inc – Breakup of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-4: Stryker – Breakup of Revenue by Business Segments (%), 2014
Figure 10-5: Boston Scientific – Breakup of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-6: GE Healthcare – Breakup of Revenue by Business Segments (%), 2014
Figure 10-7: GE Healthcare – Breakup of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-8: Covidien – Break up of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-9: Siemens Healthcare – Breakup of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-10: Philip Healthcare – Breakup of Revenue by Business Segments (%), 2014
Figure 10-11: Philip Healthcare – Breakup of Revenue by Geographies (%), 2014
Figure 10-12: Johnson & Johnson – Breakup of Medical Device Business by Geographies (%), 2014

List of Tables:

Table 6-1: Breakup of MIMID Revenue by Geographies (Million US$), 2014
Table 8-1: List of MIMDs Launched (2013-2015)
Table 10-1: Intuitive Surgical – Revenue by Business Segments (Million US$), 2013 &2014
Table 10-2: Medtronic Inc – Revenue by Business Segments (Million US$), 2013 &2014
Table 10-3: Stryker – Revenue by Business Segments (Million US$), 2013 & 2014
Table 10-4: Boston Scientific – Revenue by Business Segments (Million US$), 2014
Table 10-5: Covidien – Revenue by Business Segments (Million US$), 2013&2014
Table 10-6: Johnson & Johnson – Breakup of Medical Device Business (Million US$), 2013 & 2014